In the ever-evolving world of baseball simulation, MLB The Show 25 continues to set the bar for realism. From the crack of the bat to the roar of the crowd, San Diego Studio's flagship series captures nearly every nuance of America's pastime. Yet, one part of the experience has sparked debate across the Diamond Dynasty and Ranked Seasons communities: umpire accuracy. Many players are asking whether MLB The Show 25's umpires are actually too perfect, to MLB The Show 25 Stubs the point where the authenticity of the game begins to feel artificial.
At its core, baseball is a human sport—defined by its imperfections. The tension of a borderline pitch, the disbelief after a blown call, or the emotional eruption of a manager arguing at home plate all play into the drama that makes real-life baseball unforgettable. In The Show 25, however, those moments of human error have nearly disappeared. The question is whether that's a good thing for competitive gameplay, or a step away from what makes baseball baseball.
The Technology Behind The Calls
In MLB The Show 25, umpires operate using an upgraded “Strike Zone Precision Engine,” designed to deliver hyper-accurate pitch tracking and strike zone consistency. This system was intended to reduce frustration from bad calls in online games, especially in Diamond Dynasty where every pitch can swing the outcome. The result is an umpiring model that mirrors electronic strike zone technology seen in experimental MLB broadcasts—near-perfect, nearly robotic accuracy.
This engine factors in the exact position, break, and velocity of every pitch relative to the strike zone. In most modes, especially competitive Ranked play, umpires rarely miss a call by more than a fraction of an inch. The days of watching a knee-high strike get called a ball are largely gone. On paper, this seems like a win for fairness. But for players who crave realism and emotion, the consistency can feel clinical.
The Loss of Human Drama
Part of baseball's soul lies in its unpredictability. In real life, umpires make mistakes. A borderline call on a 3-2 count can alter the outcome of an inning or even a season. Legendary games are remembered for their controversies—Jim Joyce's missed call that cost Armando Galarraga a perfect game, or Eric Gregg's wide strike zone in the 1997 NLCS. Those imperfections create emotion, storylines, and tension.
In The Show 25, that unpredictability is largely gone. Every strike is cleanly registered, every ball outside the zone is correctly judged. While this makes the game feel “fair,” it also strips away one of the most human elements of baseball: the umpire's influence. Some players describe it as “too sterile,” noting that the drama of pitching tight corners disappears when you know the call will always be correct.
Offline players in Franchise Mode or Road to the Show can adjust umpire accuracy sliders to reintroduce variability, but even then, the margin of error is smaller than in past installments. Veteran fans of The Show 20 and The Show 21 recall umpires who were occasionally inconsistent—sometimes frustrating, sometimes thrilling. Those imperfections made the game feel alive.
Now, even when using “Variable Umpire” settings, missed calls are so rare they hardly register. The tension of working an umpire's strike zone across innings—a real-life strategy for pitchers—is practically gone.
Competitive Balance vs. Authenticity
The push toward precision makes sense in a competitive context. Diamond Dynasty and Ranked Seasons rely on fair and measurable outcomes. Inconsistent umpire calls could cause frustration during high-stakes games, especially when leaderboard placement or tournament results are on the line.
Many top players argue that perfect umpires ensure skill expression—the outcome depends purely on pitching accuracy and timing, not an unpredictable call. If a slider just clips the zone, it should be a strike. For those focused on esports-level competition, the cleaner, data-driven umpiring system is a welcome improvement.
However, purists counter that this pursuit of perfection sacrifices the soul of the sport. Baseball, by nature, thrives on debate and imperfection. Taking away the human element also removes part of what makes the sport emotionally rich. It's the tension of “that should've been a strike!” that keeps fans engaged.
The Impact on Pitching and Hitting Strategy
The hyper-accurate umpiring system has subtly shifted how players approach both pitching and hitting.
For pitchers, painting the corners has never been more rewarding—or predictable. If your pitch clips the edge of the strike zone, you can trust that the call will go your way. This encourages players to attack the edges of the plate more aggressively, reducing the need for pitch sequencing or mind games. Precision dominates over deception.
Hitters, on the other hand, have learned to adjust their plate discipline accordingly. Since the umpire's accuracy removes the uncertainty of the zone, batters can afford to take close pitches without fear of a missed call. In effect, the battle between pitcher and hitter has become more mathematical and less psychological.
While this makes for cleaner gameplay, it arguably removes the unpredictability that fuels the tension of a real at-bat. Many users report that Ranked matches now feel more like mechanical duels than dynamic, emotionally charged contests.
Should MLB The Show Bring Back Imperfect Umpires?
One of the most frequently requested community features for MLB The Show 26 is the option to toggle umpire realism at a deeper level. Players want the freedom to decide whether their games feature perfect electronic strike zones or human error-prone umpires. Some have even suggested tiered options—“Realistic Umpiring” for offline modes and “Perfect Umpiring” for online competition.
A dynamic system could also bring the best of both worlds: umpires who remain accurate overall but develop tendencies. For example, some might favor high strikes or give extra width to the corners. This kind of personality-driven umpiring would preserve fairness while adding realism and strategy, forcing players to adapt inning by inning.
Such a feature would add an exciting layer to Franchise Mode and Road to the Show, where player-umpire relationships could evolve over time. Imagine arguing a call one game, only to see that same umpire give you the benefit of the doubt in the next series. That kind of storytelling potential could make the experience feel more alive and true to baseball's human roots.
The Verdict
So, are umpires in MLB The Show 25 too accurate? In a word—yes, but intentionally so. For competitive integrity, the near-perfect system works. It ensures that every call is correct and that no player loses a Ranked game because of a bad strike call. Yet, from a realism and immersion standpoint, the pendulum may have swung too far.
Baseball's beauty lies in its chaos. Imperfect calls spark arguments, passion, and drama. They turn ordinary games into stories. MLB The Show 25's robotic precision removes that heartbeat. The game remains brilliant in its execution, but perhaps a little too clean for its own good.
In a sport built on unpredictability, perfection isn't always the goal—it's the cheap MLB The Show S 25 Stubs imperfection that makes it real. As The Show continues to chase authenticity, maybe it's time for San Diego Studio to remember that sometimes, the best strike zone is the one drawn by a human hand.
Comments (0)