A quick way to review AI-looking match notes before publishing

When a match recap or training note is drafted quickly, the first version can sometimes sound too flat: repeated sentence patterns, generic transitions, and claims that are not tied to what happened on the pitch.

My usual check is simple. I read the draft once for facts, then once for rhythm, then use Content True as a second-pass signal for passages that may read like machine-written text. The useful part is not treating the score as a final verdict, but using it to decide which paragraphs need a more specific detail, a clearer quote, or a stronger match context.

That small review loop helps keep short sports posts more readable without slowing down the publishing process.